|
||
|
|
||
![]() |
|
Howard Kanovitz essays about the artist |
||||
| art | ||||||
| Between Worlds: Painter of Contradiction by Jorn Merkert | ||||||
|
continued from page ten
The claim
to authenticity proper to photography is extended into painting by means
of this method. Kanovitz's collage method is therefore not simply a technique
but also relates to the intellectual content of his work. It creates not
only visual but intellectual illusions, leading us to pose certain questions.
The trompe-l'oeil becomes a trompe-l'esprit. By painting deceptively realistic
copies of reality, Kanovitz is at the same time an inventor of reality,
insofar as he invents realities in his paintings, which create an effect
of being simple found objects that were copied -therefore real things.
But he does this only the better to deceive us. |
|
The technique of reducing a photographic image of an object by means of a drawing to its constituent color zones and then transferring it to canvas Kanovitz was now enabled by the use of the air brush to refine to an extraordinary degree. The very fact that the subject is broken down into fields of color enabled him to work with specially cut templates and achieve subtle nuances, unimaginably delicate transitions. The use of compressed air permits extremely precise modulations and opens up all kinds of other possibilities, whether through regulating the air pressure, or varying the distance between nozzle and painting surface, or the duration of the spraying, or spraying several times with several different colors. However, this technique, distinctive as it may be at the outset, involved a certain loss of personal character. By the very fact of its perfection, the technique approaches the perfection of photography and the anonymity of photography, as well. It is not the subject that is being rendered, but its image. At the same time, the photograph becomes itself a subject. The perceptual mechanism of the camera's single eye is quite different from seeing with two eyes. To reflect this difference between the two kinds of seeing in his paintings and to make of it a thematic element was, however, secondary for Kanovitz. He instead introduced this problem as a formal element only in order to pose other questions. Our surprise and doubt about reality, which was pro- |
||||